Tuesday, September 15, 2015

on Leave a Comment

Eugenics, Genocide, Euthanasia And Infanticide


One of Margaret Sanger’s Favorite Books Was a Pro-Eugenics Tome[1] Hitler Called “My Bible”.

          "Eugenics, the social movement claiming to improve the genetic features of human populations through selective breeding and sterilization, based on the idea that it is possible to distinguish between superior and inferior elements of society, played a significant role in the history and culture of the United States prior to its involvement in World War II.
Eugenics was practiced in the United States many years before eugenics programs in Nazi Germany and U.S. programs provided much of the inspiration for the latter. Stefan Kühl has documented the consensus between Nazi race policies and those of eugenicists in other countries, including the United States, and points out that eugenicists understood Nazi policies and measures as the realization of their goals and demands.
During the Progressive Era of the late 19th and early 20th century, eugenics was considered a method of preserving and improving the dominant groups in the population; it is now generally associated with racist and nativist elements[3] (as the movement was to some extent a reaction to a change in emigration from Europe) rather than scientific genetics."[4]

Early proponents

Eugenics supporters hold signs criticizing various 'genetically inferior' groups. Wall Street, New York, c. 1915.
"The American eugenics movement was rooted in the biological determinist ideas of Sir Francis Galton, which originated in the 1880s. Galton studied the upper classes of Britain, and arrived at the conclusion that their social positions were due to a superior genetic makeup. Early proponents of eugenics believed that, through selective breeding, the human species should direct its own evolution. They tended to believe in the genetic superiority of Nordic, Germanic and Anglo-Saxon peoples; supported strict immigration and anti-miscegenation[5] laws; and supported the forcible sterilization of the poor, disabled and "immoral". Eugenics was also supported by African Americans intellectuals such as W. E. B. Du Bois, Thomas Wyatt Turner, and many academics at Tuskegee University, Howard University, and Hampton University; however they believed the best blacks were as good as the best whites and 'The Talented Tenth' of all races should mix. W. E. B. Du Bois believed "only fit blacks should procreate to eradicate the race's heritage of moral iniquity.
          The American eugenics movement received extensive funding from various corporate foundations including the Carnegie Institution, Rockefeller Foundation, and the Harriman railroad fortune. In 1906 J.H. Kellogg provided funding to help found the Race Betterment Foundation in Battle Creek, Michigan. The Eugenics Record Office (ERO) was founded in Cold Spring Harbor, New York in 1911 by the renowned biologist Charles B. Davenport, using money from both the Harriman railroad fortune and the Carnegie Institution. As late as the 1920s, the ERO was one of the leading organizations in the American eugenics movement. In years to come, the ERO collected a mass of family pedigrees and concluded that those who were unfit came from economically and socially poor backgrounds. Eugenicists such as Davenport, the psychologist Henry H. Goddard, Harry H. Laughlin, and the conservationist Madison Grant (all well respected in their time) began to lobby for various solutions to the problem of the "unfit". Davenport favored immigration restriction and sterilization as primary methods; Goddard favored segregation in his The Kallikak Family; Grant favored all of the above and more, even entertaining the idea of extermination. The Eugenics Record Office later became the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory."[6]

U.S. eugenics poster advocating for the removal of genetic "defectives" such as the insane, "feeble-minded" and criminals, and supporting the selective breeding of "high-grade" individuals, c. 1926

"Eugenics was widely accepted in the U.S. academic community. By 1928 there were 376 separate university courses in some of the United States' leading schools, enrolling more than 20,000 students, which included eugenics in the curriculum. It did, however, have scientific detractors (notably, Thomas Hunt Morgan, one of the few Mendelians to explicitly criticize eugenics), though most of these focused more on what they considered the crude methodology of eugenicists, and the characterization of almost every human characteristic as being hereditary, rather than the idea of eugenics itself.
By 1910, there was a large and dynamic network of scientists, reformers and professionals engaged in national eugenics projects and actively promoting eugenic legislation. The American Breeder's Association was the first eugenic body in the U.S., established in 1906 under the direction of biologist Charles B. Davenport. The ABA was formed specifically to "investigate and report on heredity in the human race, and emphasize the value of superior blood and the menace to society of inferior blood." Membership included Alexander Graham Bell, Stanford president David Starr Jordan and Luther Burbank. The American Association for the Study and Prevention of Infant Mortality was one of the first organizations to begin investigating infant mortality rates in terms of eugenics. They promoted government intervention in attempts to promote the health of future citizens.
Several feminist reformers advocated an agenda of eugenic legal reform. The National Federation of Women's Clubs, the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, and the National League of Women Voters were among the variety of state and local feminist organization that at some point lobbied for eugenic reforms. One of the most prominent feminists to champion the eugenic agenda was Margaret Sanger, the leader of the American birth control movement. Margaret Sanger saw birth control as a means to prevent unwanted children from being born into a disadvantaged life, and incorporated the language of eugenics to advance the movement. Sanger also sought to discourage the reproduction of persons who, it was believed, would pass on mental disease or serious physical defect. She advocated sterilization in cases where the subject was unable to use birth control.[21] Unlike other eugenicists, she rejected euthanasia. For Sanger, it was individual women and not the state who should determine whether or not to have a child."[7]

          Winning family of a Fitter Family contest stand outside of the Eugenics Building (where contestants register) at the Kansas Free Fair, in Topeka, KS.


          No one can deny the attempts at genocide going on today. ISIS and others intend to eliminate the "People Of The Book"(Christians and Jews). Never, in the history of the world, have the Christians and Jews been murdered, scattered and subjected to second class status as we see happening today. Satan is being very effective in using the False religion of Islam to work up it's adherents into frenzied killing episodes. Anti-Christianism, anti-Semitism and Christophobia are running rampant even in the United States, which was founded as a Christian Nation.


          The Bible recognizes the value of the elderly, which is probably the main reason the secular humanists denigrate the elderly. "Job 12:12, "Wisdom is with the aged with long life is understanding." "The gray head is a crown of glory if it be found in the way of righteousness. Somebody old who has walked a long time in the path of righteousness is a treasure, a treasure of wisdom and a treasure of experience and a treasure of understanding, a triumphant Christian who has fought the battle over and over and over and been victorious, who has experienced everything that the young are waiting to experience...become a great treasure to the church."[8]
          "America is now the oldest society in the history of the world. There has never been a society with this percentage of older people.
They tell us in 25 years one out of every five people will be over 65 and one out of every ten will be over 80. The graying of America. We know it's here. We see it all around us."[9]

 “Gray hair is a glorious crown; it is found in the way of righteousness” (Proverbs 16:31).

“Happy is a man who finds wisdom and who acquires understanding… She is more precious than jewels; nothing you desire compares with her. Long life is in her right hand; in her left, riches and honor” (Proverbs 3:13, 15-16).

“Remember the days of old; consider the years long past. Ask your father, and he will tell you, your elders, and they will teach you” (Deuteronomy 32:7).
“Do not rebuke an older man, but exhort him as a father, younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, and with all propriety…” (1 Timothy 5:1-2).
“You are to rise in the presence of the elderly and honor the old… I am the Lord” (Leviticus 19:32).

“Listen to your father who gave you life, and don’t despise your mother when she is old” (Proverbs 23:22).

          The article listed below is the eye opening, legal skirting ways to replace older workers with younger ones, and not get sued for age discrimination.     11 Sneaky Ways Companies Get Rid Of Older Workers: Forbeshttp://www.huffingtonpost

          "Euthanasia is categorized in different ways, which include voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is legal in some countries, U.S. states, and Canadian Provinces. Non-voluntary euthanasia is illegal in all countries. Involuntary euthanasia is usually considered murder. As of 2006, euthanasia is the most active area of research in contemporary bioethics.
In some countries there is a divisive public controversy over the moral, ethical, and legal issues of euthanasia. Those who are against euthanasia may argue for the sanctity of life, while proponents of euthanasia rights emphasize alleviating suffering, and preserving bodily integrity, self-determination, and personal autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or assisted suicide is legal include the Netherlands, Colombia, Switzerland, Japan, Germany, Belgium, 
Luxemourg, Estonia, Albania, the US states of Washington, Oregon, Montana, and Vermont and, starting in 2015, the Canadian Province of Quebec"[10]

          Students of Death: Euthanasia Doctors Seek Existential Answers at Auschwitz. "A group of Belgium's leading practitioners of euthanasia recently visited the Auschwitz concentration camp memorial to learn more about death and humanity. The trip proved to be just as controversial for the doctors as it did insightful. Distelmans, who is the chairman of the Belgian government's Euthanasia Commission, has invited all of them on a trip to Poland. In Auschwitz he intends to reflect with them on the meaning of "death with dignity". That's also the title of the tour, which is printed on the program booklet. It has to do with existential questions: self-determination, fear and freedom -- and what these things mean to us today. And it concerns how far we go, should go, and should be allowed to go."[11] Their goal was to determine what could be called "death with dignity.


          Last but not least, we discuss infanticide. If this gets popular enough there won't be much need for the above categories. The only ones left alive will be the elites. It has been estimated that half of the black population of the US has come to its end in abortion clinics. Margaret Sanger would be proud of the accomplishments of her abortion promotion. Although Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in the US, it only accounts for about 10 percent of the abortions performed here. Does that tell you how many other places that are available, where you can get your baby killed?

Just for perspective -
Almost 50 times as many people have died in our country's abortion clinics than in all the wars in our country's history.
1,354,663 in war vs. 70,000,000 aborted

"I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan...I was escorted to the platform, was introduced and began to speak.....in the end, through simple illustrations, I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered." Margaret Sanger


Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg[12]  

                                           Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood

Margaret Sanger and Political Correctness

          As per our usual practice, my husband asked me to proof read his recently written paper entitled “Eugenics, Genocide, Euthanasia, and Infanticide”.  However, as I read it, I began to do further research specifically on Margaret Sanger and her connection with both eugenics and infanticide.  I decided to add my findings as a co-author, to my husbands already more expansive topic.
          For purposes of full disclosure, I confess that I am a Christian; therefore, generally speaking I am against abortion, but I am not against the use of contraception.  In addition, knowing that some of my readers may have had the unfortunate experience of having a planned abortion, I want to make clear that having an abortion, like any other sin is forgivable through confession of sin to the Lord; Jesus is full of mercy and grace.  Neither judgment nor heaping on guilt or shame is meant to have any part in what I wish to share with you.  Remember, we have all sinned and fallen short of the mark, for only God is good and totally righteous.  The only righteousness that man can ever give thanks for is none of his own making, but only that which is imparted to us through faith in Jesus Christ as our personal Lord and Savior.
          At one time, President Clinton is reported to have said that abortion is meant to be legal, safe, and rare. Well, it has been made legal through our court system.  That is a change for the convenience of mankind, but it does not change the fact that God’s law, “to choose life,” has not and will not be changed.  Unfortunately, the passing of Roe v. Wade, may have made abortions legal, but the “safe’ part, though being safer than self administered abortions of times past, is still left in a very questionable state as seen through the recent trial of one such abortion mill doctor, Dr. Kermit Gosnell, and the horror stories that are hushed up to prevent the public from finding out some of the atrocities being committed in many of the abortion mills across the United States and elsewhere.  Only one news channel covered the trial fully, all other media chose to give little or no attention to reporting the true facts, for they did not fit the politically correct agenda.  What about the third point; are abortions rare, only for the extreme cases of a true threat to the life of the mother, or for cases of rape or incest?  The statistics are that presently, approximately 70,000,000 babies have been aborted in the U.S. alone.  I doubt very seriously that anyone could consider that to be rare or used only for the extreme reasons that I have previously mentioned.  Instead of being rare, abortions have been performed, even up to and including partial birth abortions executed during the nine month of pregnancy, are now considered legal but not rare.  Abortions are not rare, but rather “abortion on demand” even for the simplest of reasons that the pregnancy has just become an inconvenience.  As if that wasn’t horrific enough, now we have the sale of the organs of the babies, or the PC term ‘fetus’. 
          I do not intend to draw you into an argument concerning the pros and cons of the practice of abortion.  Rather, my intent is to expose the much more sinister and evil roots of the abortion mills, for it is not the simple offer of a woman’s right to do as she wishes with her own body as the founder, Margaret Sanger and her supporters, would have us believe. 
          Let us delve into the fiendish beliefs that allowed her to use contraception, a seemingly good benefit as seen in the eyes of many, as a cover for her deeper beliefs and motives.  That is merely the visible element that is used as a front, or a delusion, that the invisible and evil ulterior motives and far reaching mission may be hidden from view, in order the keep the public masses fooled and unaware of the real purposes.  When all the layers of the onion are pulled back, what do we see at the core of Margaret Sanger’s true mission?  Let me give you some facts, many are from her own published words will expose the evil that is hidden.  You are free to make up your own mind, deny the bigger truth, or truly look at it for what it really is with eyes wide open.

          The pro-eugenics book, “Passing of the Great Race, introduced to you at the beginning of my husbands work, is at the core of what lies behind the beginnings of the real mission, or desired end result, of Margaret Sanger’s work.  The previously mentioned book by Madison Grant was written in 1916.  Stephen Gould called it “the most influential tract of American scientific racism”.  One of Grant’s biggest fans was Adolph Hitler, who called it “My Bible”.  We know from history how that played out in Hitler’s attempts to exterminate Jews, homosexuals, the disabled, and many more during his reign.  By the time his use of eugenics became more openly known, many in America who had praised Grant’s ideas had walked away from it, but Margaret Sanger held fast to its principles much longer.  In fact, she highly recommended the reading of this book in list of references for her followers to read and study. 
          Because of the idea of who was deemed to be unfit to reproduce many were sterilized, and forced to have abortions, often without even being informed of the procedures being done.  I wonder what qualifications were used to decide who would be included in the group of persons to select those persons who were seen to be “unfit.”  We know that the Nazis determined that Jews were unfit, not just for reproduction, but to even continue to live.  Christians, who helped Jews, were obviously also determined to be unfit, along with the disabled, or others such as epileptics, etc.  Can you imagine having a group of little gods who would be in charge of determining who must die because the group made such a decision with their finite minds?   
          The contraception issue is very benign in comparison to what she desired to bring about in the world.  When confronted with the truth, we should hear the alarm of pure racism.  The politically correct agenda endeavors to cover up the hidden bases of hatred and evil that formed the bases of Margaret Sanger’s ultimate agenda.  The valid use of contraception is used  as a cover up to tell us “nothing here, only sex education and the use of contraceptives,” but if we will honestly delve into the deeper understanding of her true agenda we should be able to break through that fake façade to discover the more sinister motivation of her movement..  So let us begin!   

The following are direct quotes from an article entitled:
"Margaret Sanger
Quotes, History, and Biography"

          “Margaret Sanger promoted negative eugenics which is the attempt to “improve” the human population by discouraging “unfit” people from reproducing. The “unfit” people included the poor, the sick, the disabled, and the “feeble-minded,” the “idiots,” the “morons,” and the “insane.” And “discouragement” from reproducing included the use of force.  In her 1920 book, Woman and the New Race, Sanger wrote that birth control “is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the
unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become
          Through it all the underlying theme, “eliminating the unfit”, never changed. In her 1922 book, The Pivot of Civilization, she attacked charity as counterproductive, and dangerous, for helping the poor to produce even more “human waste,” Sanger’s term for the children of the poor.  She wrote, “Organized charity is itself the symptom of a malignant social disease.” And, “Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks [of people] that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.”
          And in 1939, Sanger went to work “cultivating the garden,” meaning weeding out the unfit.  She initiated the Negro Project to weed out the unfit from the black population. In bringing birth control to the then largely poor (i.e. unfit) population of the South, with a few influential black ministers promoting the project as the solution to poverty, Sanger hoped to significantly reduce the black population. Martin Luther King, Sr., as the eldest son of nine children born into poverty in a family of sharecroppers, would have made the perfect target for “elimination.” But his birth had already taken place.
          Sanger’s legacy today, which is being carried on by Planned Parenthood, includes the devastating impact of “birth control” on the black community.  Planned Parenthood has continued the practice of targeting the black population.  Over 30% of all abortions are performed on black women and close to 40% of black pregnancies end in abortion.
          Planned Parenthood successfully created a public image of an organization working to help the poor, while hiding the reality that it targets
the vulnerable. That was Sanger’s plan from the start.”
------                            -------------                           ------------
          I continued my research concerning Margaret Sanger by reading the information presented on Wikipedia.  You too can read it for yourself to see what your own conclusions may be. This is the way Wikipedia disregards and excuses their neglect of truthful and full disclosure of her radical views on racism and eugenics, as seen in the paragraph below:

          "Due to her connection with Planned Parenthood, many who are opposed to abortion frequently condemn Sanger by criticizing her views on racial supremacy, birth control, and eugenics.[75][76][note 7] In spite of
such controversies, Sanger continues to be regarded as a force in the
American reproductive rights movement and woman's rights movement."

My own reflections concerning the Wikipedia info:
          So from that one short paragraph, we are to come to the conclusion that her racism and opinion that being poor is a major criteria that makes one “unfit” for reproduction is simply a minor issue that can not possibly have any ill effects or influence perpetrated upon the decisions of who is unfit to reproduce in society? Ha!  They simply gloss it over; choosing to point out that only people who are against abortion would find such opinions troubling.  How deceitful!  How is that a full confrontation of her real basic beliefs and how they influenced everything else that she did?  As I read concerning her views of the three groups that she considered to be lacking enough "responsible control" concerning planning a family, or using her earlier terminology, family limitation, she would have considered Catholics, or any families who chose to have many children, to be "irresponsible," and therefore quite possibly in need of forced abortions; sterilization, or at the least, mandating the forced use of contraceptives.
     Instead, Wikipedia exalts and celebrates her promotion of sex education, use of contraception, and women's rights issues while intentionally
whitewashing or ignoring completely her racist, and elitist views of just who
she considered to be "unfit" for reproduction. One such group, considered to be unfit, was the poor.  Does that seem to be an intelligent basis for you?  I can think of some wonderful poor people who produced some mighty fantastic children, who grew up to be even more fantastic adults.  Conversely, I can think of some very rich people who produced children that turned out to be a bit less than what is considered to be either outstanding or admirable people.
          She was a socialist and a humanist.  Perhaps that’s why she never heard of the concept or possibility that, especially in America, if one works hard, strives to get an education, and strikes out to do and be the best that he can, maybe he can even become the president of the U.S., or whatever he puts his mind and efforts into becoming.  A person’s economic status does not determine what kind of a parent you will be or the quality of children that you may produce, yet the poor were automatically being deemed as unfit for reproduction.  We have already mentioned that Martin Luther King, Sr. was from a very poor family and would have been considered and excellent target; therefore, under this plan, Martin Luther King would never have been born. 
          Margaret Sanger remained a part of the eugenics movement even after many of the other founders and luminaries disavowed it due to Hitler’s actions. Under her beliefs such people as Dr. Ben Carson, the neurosurgeon who was the first to separate conjoined twins, would never have been born.  His mother was a single parent, poor, and illiterate.  Yet she raised this great man.  I have epilepsy, making me a target for sterilization, denied the right to have my three children.  Today, with the study of genes, it is possible to determine who might have the genes that may possibly produce certain diseases that may cause disabilities.  For example, the disease ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, if that gene had been present in his parent(s), Lou Gehrig, the baseball player would not been born.  Neither would Stephen Hawing been born.  Who is he?  He also has ALS, a motor neuron disease, which confines him completely  to a wheel chair and is so disabled that he can not even speak, but speaks with the use of a computer.  Disabled, shouldn’t he be considered unfit also?  Who is he that he should matter?  Have you ever heard of the Cern’s Large Hadron Collider?  It is the huge instrument being used by the top scientists today in the endeavor to break down elements even smaller than an atom.  Stephen Hawking is one of those scientists.  He is a physicist, and a Cosmologist.
          I ask you to do your own research.  This is by no means an extensive coverage of the dark and sinister motives that lie at the very foundations of the formation of Planned Parenthood as established by Margaret Sanger.  If you search further you will be able to discern for yourself, just what groups of people are being most affected and diminished by this method of population control.  No, don’t take my word for it.  Draw your own conclusions.  For me, I would much rather leave the decision of who is “fit” to reproduce in the hands of the Lord God Almighty, whose wisdom and knowledge is infinite, not finite as is the mind of mankind.  Atrocities, such as using aborted babies to harvest their organs to sell for financial gain, always occur when man tries to step into the role that belongs to only God.

Obvious conclusions -

          It can be easily seen that the Eugenics, Genocide, Euthanasia and Infanticide views of today are directly attributable to the false teaching of Darwinism in place of the truth of the Bible. Once God is removed from the equation, anything goes. Once someone believes that they are simply an animal, who has no relationship to God, or that there isn't any such thing as God, there are then no restrictions on anything a person wants to do. The problem with this thinking is that God is real; and there are consequences for going against His laws. Yes, there really are absolutes!

          The United States, as well as some other countries, have one , and only one chance to avoid the catastrophic judgments that are so rightly disserved.  The populations of these countries need to be begging the Christians and Jews to pray: "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land"[13].  Otherwise, welcome to the tribulation.

[1] Passing Of The Great Race, by Madison Grant 1916
[2] http://www.lifenews.com/2015/09/04/one-of-margaret-sangers-favorite-books-was-a-pro-eugenics-tome-hitler-called-my-bible/
[3] nativist elements - the policy of protecting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants
[4] Wikipedia
[5] the mixing of different racial groups through marriage, cohabitation, sexual relations or procreation
[6] Wikipedia
[7] Wikipedia
[8] http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/56-13/Gods-Plan-for-Older-Men-and-Older-Women
[9] http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/56-13/Gods-Plan-for-Older-Men-and-Older-Women
[10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia

[11] http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/belgian-euthanasia-doctors-seek-answers-at-auschwitz-a-1003441.html

[13]  2 Chronicles 7:14

Sunday, September 6, 2015

on Leave a Comment

Reasons for judgment

This is what you might see of the "Throne in Heaven" today, if you are a Christian when you die.

This is what the people who have not accepted Jesus, as Lord and Savior, will see when they come before the Judgment Seat of Christ. Every word you have uttered, every deed you have done and every thought you have had will be reviewed, however, you will be condemned only because of you rejection of Christ as Lord and Savior and/or your blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.

What will decide the judgment you will experience, and why? 

          Acceptance of Christ as Savior is an individual decision.  A country cannot make that decision. A country (or world population) must simply determine to follow the covenants and laws of God, or to reject them. Countries, tribes and other divisions, or groups, of people cannot be judged, because nations have no afterlife and salvation is an individual exercise. Since nations can't be judged in the after life, they must be judged in the here and now. There is no such thing as universal salvation. Salvation is between you and the Lord - period. Therefore, we should look at what would bring judgment on a nation.

Abortion is an international problem.

 It has, however, been encouraged and promoted, worldwide, by the United States Government.

US Abortion Clock.org [1] as of 5:45 PM  9-3-2015

In United States today 

US since 1973: Roe vs Wade 

By Planned Parenthood since 1970

By Planned Parenthood this year
United States this Year 

US this Year after 
16 weeks gestation

US this Year due to rape
or incest

Black babies since '73 in US[2]

Worldwide since 1980 

Worldwide this Year 

Worldwide Today 

          Compare the U.S. "rape and incest" figures with "United States this year" and you get the number of babies killed as birth control. 727,965 baby deaths, for birth control, in just 9 months of the year.

          There have been 1.72-billion abortions worldwide in the last 40 years[3]. Is there anyone who thinks this makes God happy? The question here is; will judgment fall harder on those having abortions, or on those providing the service.  How about the company that allows its health insurance to cover abortions? How about the government employees trying to get religious institutions to pay for abortion services? NO, abortion is not an unforgivable sin, but you have to humble yourself and ask forgiveness; and go and sin no more. But what about the country that promotes abortion and fails to turn from its wicked ways?

The teaching of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution

          The religion of Darwinism is being taught to our children as fact. The truth, of the Creation of the Bible, has been displaced in the classroom. The Bible itself is no longer welcome in our schools. If the story of Creation can be discredited in our children's minds, the entire Bible comes into question, as truth. The real shame is that this is being done in the name of science. Science is supposed to be based on provable fact. There is no credible evidence for the evolution hypothesis, whereas the creation story has many provable aspects. In 1963, the Supreme Court Of The United States, determined that prayer in school was unconstitutional, despite the first amendment, and the fact that our school systems were set up to teach the Bible.

Rejection of the principals of Godly marriage.

          The Lord set the example, of what marriage should be, in the Garden of Eden. Yes, I know that some of you don't believe the Biblical account of the garden; to your own detriment. ( Belief, in the Garden of Eden story, will come to your understanding at the same time the "every knee shall bow and every tongue confess" truth hits you.) Jesus reiterated this marriage example in the New Testament[4].

Countries That Allow Gay Marriage

Countries Where Gay Marriage is Legal in Some Jurisdictions

          As we can see, the gay marriage apostasy came about as we followed the example of Mexico and Norway. Two of the intellectual centers of the world?

People of the Book are being slaughtered

          The "PEOPLE OF THE BOOK" (Christians and Jews) are being slaughtered at an unbelievable rate. The Islamic hordes, such as ISIS, Hamas, and Hezbollah among many others are attempting conquer the world for Satan. You will notice I used ISIS instead of ISIL. This is because ISIL stands for the Levant where Israel doesn't exist. The Obama administration know this, and uses ISIL anyway. Just another example of our country backing away from supporting Israel.
          "Credible research has reached the shocking conclusion that an estimate of more than 100,000 Christians are violently killed because of some relation to their faith every year," Vatican spokesman Monsieur Silvano Maria Tomassi said Tuesday in a radio address to the United Nations Human Rights Council. 
          Other Christians and other believers are subjected to forced displacement, to the destruction of their places of worship, to rape and to the abduction of their leaders, as it recently happened in the case of Bishops Yohanna Ibrahim and Boulos Yaziji, in Aleppo [Syria]," Tomassi said.[5]
          "Oddly enough there were not enough Jews killed in jihad to significantly affect the totals of the Great Annihilation. The jihad in Arabia was 100 percent effective, but the numbers were in the thousands, not millions." [6]

Turning away from the countries foundations

          Turning away from the foundations of Christianity, by the United States and other nations, has been taking place for well over 50 years. It is more egregious for the United States and Israel, because the Lord set the foundations for these nations. There are those ignorant people, who doubt the Lord had anything to do with the founding of these countries. That ignorance is compounded by the attempts at revisionist history taught in our school systems. Overwhelming evidence exists, that shows without a doubt, the United States was established as a Christian Nation, and Israel was established as a Hebrew nation. The FACT that Judaism and Christianity are  one and the same religion is discussed, at length, in another paper[7].

          The question we seem to face is not why would God punish our nation, but rather, why would He not. Just looking at the basic 10 commandments; are there any that are even shown respect in the United States? The Reverend Billy Graham said: "If God doesn't punish the United States, He will have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah".

[1] http://www.numberofabortions.com/

[2] This is what Margaret Sanger advocated - to rid the world of the black race, because they are inferior.
[3] https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/1.72-billion-abortions-worldwide-in-the-last-40-years

[4] Matthew 19
[5] http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/06/02/vatican-spokesman-claims-100000-christians-killed-annually-because-faith/
[6] http://www.politicalislam.com/tears-of-jihad/
[7] http://www.thespiritsnestministries.com/2014/09/mashugana-for-yehoshua_1.html