“Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of Earth's near-surface air and
oceans since the mid-20th
century and its projected continuation. According to the 2007 Fourth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), global surface temperature increased
0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) during
the 20th century.[2][A] Most
of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century has
been caused by increasing
concentrations of greenhouse gases, which result from human
activity such as the burning of fossil fuel and deforestation.[3]
Global dimming, a
result of increasing concentrations of atmospheric aerosols that
block sunlight from reaching the surface, has partially countered the effects
of warming induced by greenhouse gases. The global warming controversy is a
variety of disputes regarding the nature, causes, and consequences of global
warming. The disputed issues include the causes of increased global average air temperature,
especially since the mid-20th century, whether this warming trend is
unprecedented or within normal climatic variations, whether humankind has contributed
significantly to it, and whether the increase is wholly or partially an
artifact of poor measurements. Additional disputes concern estimates of climate sensitivity, predictions of additional
warming, and what the consequences of global warming will be.”[1]
Carbon Dioxide is a fertilizer, and necessary for
life. "The more carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere, the more content the plants become – just ask anyone who has
worked in a greenhouse," Sussman writes. "In fact, that is a portion
of the carbon dioxide debate no one bothers to address – the plant kingdom
would abound if carbon dioxide levels were to increase in the global
atmosphere.” Carbon Dioxide's increase
is well within historical norms. "And
how much has CO2 increased in the atmosphere over the past 150 years?
Approximately 35%. That's all. Slightly more than a 1/3 increase in a century
and a half! And the increase is clearly within historical norms."
The biggest greenhouse gas is water vapor: a fact the
government hides. “Approximately 80% of our air pollution stems
from hydrocarbons released by vegetation, so let's not go overboard in setting
and enforcing tough emission standards from man-made sources.”[2] “I've been telling
people that it is only a matter of time before the environmental community woke
up and realized that H2O is the #1 greenhouse gas.”[3]
"Curiously, research I culled from the Department of Energy fails to list
water vapor as a greenhouse gas," he continues. "This is incredibly
disingenuous, given that, in reality, water vapor is the giant of all
greenhouse gases, accounting for 95% of their sum. (When excluding water vapor
from the mix), the contribution of CO2 emissions created by human activity
accounts for only 2.33% of the earth's greenhouse effect." [4]
“It is virtually
shoved down our throats that scientists are in complete agreement
about global warming. Al Gore and the media assure us there is an
absolute consensus in the scientific community that humans are heating the
planet and irreversible damage is looming as a result of man's carbon
output. The truth is, there is not an irrefutable
consensus. How about some intellectual honesty? Reasonable
debate? Or, in the least, a different explanation.”[5] Dr. Ivar Giaever, a former professor with
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in
physics, abruptly announced his resignation Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2011 from the
premier physics society in disgust over its officially stated policy that "global
warming is occurring." The official
position of the American Physical Society (APS) supports the theory that man's
actions have inexorably led to the warming of the planet, through increased
emissions of carbon dioxide.
Is there really anything that we should worry about? As we have seen, Al Gore’s plan to reduce CO2
by 90 per cent by the year 2050 would be impossible. Nancy Pelosi said that “The impact of climate
change is a tremendous risk to the security and well-being of our
countries.” "It's important to say
that the scandals we've had don't change the fundamental point that global
warming is man-made and we need to tackle it," says Bjorn Lomborg, a
Danish academic and environmental writer. In his view, "the standard
message—that we need to cut a lot of emissions right now or doom is upon us—is
not correct." He advocates investments in green technology instead of
cutting emissions. "Census data
projects that by 2050, the population of the United States will have increased
from 310 million to 404 million. Presently 34 percent of CO2 emissions are
derived from transportation, 40 percent from electricity generation, and 25
percent from business and industry (including natural gas to heat homes). Add
meeting the lifestyle needs of 94 million new people into the mix and a 90
percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 essentially requires the
elimination of all fossil fuels." “A
United Nations group, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC,
has been heavily criticized for publishing an unsubstantiated claim that
Himalayan glaciers would entirely melt away by 2035. A recent report also
included several other claims later found to lack a scientific basis, including
predictions of the impact of climate change on agriculture in Africa
and the retreat of Amazonian rain forests, among others.”[6] On April 17, 2009, the administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency declares that emissions of carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare, the legal
prerequisite for regulating such emissions under the Clean Air Act. On June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of
Representatives passes legislation by a 219-212 vote that calls for cutting U.S. industrial
emissions of greenhouse gases by 17% from 2005 levels by 2020, including the
requirement that companies buy permits for emissions. On September 16, 2010, White House science
adviser John
Holdren urged people to start using the phrase Global Climate disruption
during a speech last week in Oslo ,
echoing a plea he made three years earlier. Holdren said global warming is a
"dangerous misnomer" for a problem far more complicated than a rise
in temperature. The kook radical
progressives are out to get us. As I
said above, this is a political tool designed to let the globalists take over
control of our fuels and control the population through environmental
regulation.
When the Lord designed the world He set up certain things
that would keep His creation in line with His design principles. Global heating and cooling have varied
throughout history. Even the scientific
community agrees with this. It is always
amazing to me that despite all its detractors, no one has ever been able to
disprove the Bible, and the greatest scientific advances come through
collaboration with it.
Update 4-25-2014
Currently, mankind is putting
7 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air annually. Nature is putting 700
billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air annually. The global temperature has risen by 6 tenths
of 1 percent in the last 50 years. What has to be determined is whether these
changes are natural or man made and if they are detrimental or beneficial. Climate change is a fact of history. What we
need to determine is if it is in Gods design or not. His directive to us is to take dominion over
the land, to work it and to keep it. Genesis
1:28 ESV "And God blessed them.
And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue
it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens
and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
Update 5-31-2015
Exposing the governmental LIE
about man made global climate change.
1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming
2. https://w3.newsmax.com/LP/Finance/RWL/RWL-Dark-Winter?dkt_nbr=5yhwxf4i
3. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323981304579079030750537994
4. http://www.newsiosity.com/articles/politics/scientists-are-lying-about-warming-trend-according-one-climate-change-denier
5. http://www.wsj.com/articles/schoolroom-climate-change-indoctrination-1432767611
0 comments:
Post a Comment